[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":382},["ShallowReactive",2],{"section-links-solutions-en":3,"section-links-reglementation-en":36,"section-links-guides-en":65,"section-links-comparatifs-en":90,"comparison-en-tprm-platform-selection-criteria":103},[4,8,12,16,20,24,28,32],{"label":5,"to":6,"description":7},"DORA + ISO 27001","\u002Fen\u002Fsolutions\u002Fdora-iso27001-compliance-software","Run DORA and ISO 27001 in one platform: CTPP register, SoA, Annex A controls and unified audit exports.",{"label":9,"to":10,"description":11},"NIS2 vendors","\u002Fen\u002Fsolutions\u002Fnis2-vendor-compliance","Extend your NIS2 compliance to your vendor chain: assessment campaigns, supply chain mapping and regulator-ready exports.",{"label":13,"to":14,"description":15},"Supply chain","\u002Fen\u002Fsolutions\u002Fsupply-chain-cybersecurity","Map your supply chain, assess your vendors' cybersecurity and track remediation through to risk closure.",{"label":17,"to":18,"description":19},"Third-party GRC","\u002Fen\u002Fsolutions\u002Fthird-party-grc-platform","CISAPP brings governance, risk and compliance (GRC) together for your third-party ecosystem: regulatory frameworks, audits and risk register.",{"label":21,"to":22,"description":23},"TPRM SaaS","\u002Fen\u002Fsolutions\u002Ftprm-saas","CISAPP is a TPRM SaaS platform unifying assessment campaigns, scoring, dependency mapping and regulatory compliance.",{"label":25,"to":26,"description":27},"Vendor risk","\u002Fen\u002Fsolutions\u002Fvendor-risk-management","Map, assess and steer your vendor risk with campaigns, a security score and a centralised risk register.",{"label":29,"to":30,"description":31},"Questionnaires","\u002Fen\u002Fsolutions\u002Fvendor-security-questionnaire","Run preconfigured vendor security questionnaire campaigns (ISO 27001, NIS2, DORA, GDPR) and track responses in real time.",{"label":33,"to":34,"description":35},"SecOps score","\u002Fen\u002Fsolutions\u002Fvendor-security-score","Track a vendor security score computed automatically from external technical scans (DNS, TLS, exposure, headers, breach), with history and alerts.",[37,41,45,49,53,57,61],{"label":38,"to":39,"description":40},"AI Act","\u002Fen\u002Fregulations\u002Fai-act","Prepare your EU AI Act compliance: AI system register, FRIA and article-level mapping, connected to your risk management.",{"label":42,"to":43,"description":44},"DORA","\u002Fen\u002Fregulations\u002Fdora","Manage your critical third-party ICT provider (CTPP) register, TLPT testing, and ICT incidents in an audit-ready DORA framework.",{"label":46,"to":47,"description":48},"GDPR","\u002Fen\u002Fregulations\u002Fgdpr","Maintain your records of processing activities and DPIAs, and manage data breaches with a severity wizard and a 72-hour notification tracker.",{"label":50,"to":51,"description":52},"ISO 27001","\u002Fen\u002Fregulations\u002Fiso-27001","Manage your Statement of Applicability (SoA), Annex A controls and ISO 27001 audit evidence in a single platform.",{"label":54,"to":55,"description":56},"NIS2","\u002Fen\u002Fregulations\u002Fnis2","Manage your NIS2 obligations (Article 21 measures, significant incidents, supply chain) and prepare regulator-ready exports from one platform.",{"label":58,"to":59,"description":60},"Part-IS","\u002Fen\u002Fregulations\u002Fpart-is","EASA Part-IS compliance (Regulations (EU) 2023\u002F203 and 2022\u002F1645): aviation ISMS, PSOE levels, Present & Suitable self-assessment, evidence and audit questionnaire.",{"label":62,"to":63,"description":64},"TISAX","\u002Fen\u002Fregulations\u002Ftisax","Understand TISAX assessment levels (AL1 to AL3), the VDA ISA catalogue, label validity, and what an automotive supplier must prove to its customers.",[66,70,74,78,82,86],{"label":67,"to":68,"description":69},"Fourth-party risk","\u002Fen\u002Fresources\u002Ffourth-party-risk","Your vendors depend on subcontractors you've never assessed. How to identify and manage this often-invisible fourth-party risk.",{"label":71,"to":72,"description":73},"Questionnaire fatigue","\u002Fen\u002Fresources\u002Fsecurity-questionnaire-fatigue","Why security questionnaires overwhelm procurement, security teams, and vendors alike, and how to break the re-entry cycle without losing rigor.",{"label":75,"to":76,"description":77},"Supply chain attack","\u002Fen\u002Fresources\u002Fsupply-chain-cyberattack","How a cyberattack at a vendor spreads into your organization, why it's hard to anticipate, and how to structure your defense against it.",{"label":79,"to":80,"description":81},"Concentration & SPOF","\u002Fen\u002Fresources\u002Fvendor-concentration-risk-spof","How to identify single points of failure (SPOF) hidden in your vendor chain and map risk concentration before an incident reveals it for you.",{"label":83,"to":84,"description":85},"Due diligence","\u002Fen\u002Fresources\u002Fvendor-cyber-due-diligence","How to structure cyber due diligence before signing a vendor contract, what to ask, and how to avoid inheriting a third party's risk unknowingly.",{"label":87,"to":88,"description":89},"Incident playbook","\u002Fen\u002Fresources\u002Fvendor-security-incident-playbook","What to do in the first hours after a vendor discloses a security incident: a 5-step playbook to assess impact, contain, and document.",[91,95,99],{"label":92,"to":93,"description":94},"CISAPP vs spreadsheet","\u002Fen\u002Fcomparisons\u002Fcisapp-vs-spreadsheet-third-party-risk","How far a spreadsheet takes you in vendor risk management, and the point at which it costs more than a platform: a comparison on verifiable criteria.",{"label":96,"to":97,"description":98},"European alternatives","\u002Fen\u002Fcomparisons\u002Feuropean-alternatives-us-tprm-platforms","What choosing a European vendor changes for third-party risk management: applicable law, data transfers, sovereignty and GDPR compliance.",{"label":100,"to":101,"description":102},"TPRM selection criteria","\u002Fen\u002Fcomparisons\u002Ftprm-platform-selection-criteria","An evaluation grid for third-party risk platforms: regulatory coverage, assessment cycle, evidence, hosting, integrations and total cost of ownership.",{"id":104,"title":105,"author":106,"body":107,"description":102,"entities":328,"extension":332,"faq":333,"keywords":352,"meta":357,"navigation":358,"ogImage":359,"path":101,"persona":360,"publishedAt":359,"regulation":359,"relatedFeatures":361,"relatedPages":362,"seo":365,"shortTitle":100,"slug":366,"sources":367,"stem":378,"tldr":379,"updatedAt":380,"__hash__":381},"comparisons_en\u002Fen\u002Fcomparisons\u002Ftprm-platform-selection-criteria.md","TPRM platform: selection criteria and scoring grid | CISAPP","CISAPP",{"type":108,"value":109,"toc":320},"minimark",[110,115,123,142,146,261,265,268,299,303],[111,112,114],"h2",{"id":113},"what-is-expected-of-a-tprm-platform","What is expected of a TPRM platform?",[116,117,118,122],"p",{},[119,120,121],"strong",{},"A third-party risk platform is the system of record for everything you outsource: the third parties, their criticality, their assessments and the associated evidence."," The deciding criterion is not feature breadth but the ability to produce, with no extra work, what an auditor or a regulator will ask for.",[124,125,126],"key-takeaways",{},[127,128,129,133,136,139],"ul",{},[130,131,132],"li",{},"Start from applicable obligations, not from the feature catalogue.",[130,134,135],{},"Check that evidence is tied to the control, not merely stored next to it.",[130,137,138],{},"Hosting and applicable law are criteria, not an infrastructure detail.",[130,140,141],{},"Total cost includes residual internal time, often larger than the subscription.",[111,143,145],{"id":144},"which-evaluation-grid-to-use","Which evaluation grid to use?",[147,148,150],"comparison-table",{"caption":149},"TPRM platform selection grid, in decreasing order of impact",[151,152,153,169],"table",{},[154,155,156],"thead",{},[157,158,159,163,166],"tr",{},[160,161,162],"th",{},"Criterion",[160,164,165],{},"Question to ask the vendor",[160,167,168],{},"Warning sign",[170,171,172,184,195,206,217,228,239,250],"tbody",{},[157,173,174,178,181],{},[175,176,177],"td",{},"Frameworks covered",[175,179,180],{},"Which texts are built in, and when were they last updated?",[175,182,183],{},"Mapping delivered as a spreadsheet",[157,185,186,189,192],{},[175,187,188],{},"Evidence and audit",[175,190,191],{},"How is evidence tied to a control and timestamped?",[175,193,194],{},"File storage with no link to the control",[157,196,197,200,203],{},[175,198,199],{},"Assessment cycle",[175,201,202],{},"Can frequency differ by third-party criticality?",[175,204,205],{},"One annual campaign only",[157,207,208,211,214],{},[175,209,210],{},"Dependency chain",[175,212,213],{},"Are sub-processors modelled?",[175,215,216],{},"View limited to tier 1",[157,218,219,222,225],{},[175,220,221],{},"Hosting",[175,223,224],{},"Where is the data, under which law?",[175,226,227],{},"Vague answer",[157,229,230,233,236],{},[175,231,232],{},"Integrations",[175,234,235],{},"API, SSO, export?",[175,237,238],{},"Manual export only",[157,240,241,244,247],{},[175,242,243],{},"Implementation",[175,245,246],{},"Time to the first real campaign?",[175,248,249],{},"Project quoted in months",[157,251,252,255,258],{},[175,253,254],{},"Total cost",[175,256,257],{},"Seats, configuration, support included?",[175,259,260],{},"Pricing per assessed third party",[111,262,264],{"id":263},"which-mistakes-come-up-most-often","Which mistakes come up most often?",[116,266,267],{},"Three, consistently:",[269,270,271,277,289],"ol",{},[130,272,273,276],{},[119,274,275],{},"Choosing on the demo rather than on the expected evidence."," Ask to see the export an auditor will receive, not the dashboard.",[130,278,279,288],{},[119,280,281,282,287],{},"Overlooking ",[283,284,286],"a",{"href":285},"\u002Fen\u002Fglossary\u002Ffourth-party-risk","fourth-party risk","."," A platform blind to tier 2 leaves the main blind spot open.",[130,290,291,294,295,298],{},[119,292,293],{},"Forgetting the vendor side."," If your third parties must create an account per customer, response rates drop — ",[283,296,297],{"href":72},"questionnaire fatigue"," is a real success factor.",[111,300,302],{"id":301},"where-cisapp-sits-on-this-grid","Where CISAPP sits on this grid",[116,304,305,306,308,309,308,311,313,314,316,317,287],{},"The ",[283,307,54],{"href":55},", ",[283,310,42],{"href":43},[283,312,50],{"href":51}," and ",[283,315,46],{"href":47}," frameworks are built in and share the same evidence; the reassessment cycle is configured by criticality; tier-2 dependencies are mapped; hosting is European. See also ",[283,318,319],{"href":97},"European alternatives to US TPRM platforms",{"title":321,"searchDepth":322,"depth":322,"links":323},"",2,[324,325,326,327],{"id":113,"depth":322,"text":114},{"id":144,"depth":322,"text":145},{"id":263,"depth":322,"text":264},{"id":301,"depth":322,"text":302},[329,330,331],"TPRM","Security questionnaire","Security posture score","md",[334,337,340,343,346,349],{"q":335,"a":336},"What is a TPRM platform?","A Third-Party Risk Management platform centralises the inventory of third parties, their assessment, evidence collection and remediation tracking, and ties those elements to the applicable compliance frameworks. It acts as the system of record for everything outsourced.",{"q":338,"a":339},"Where should a comparison start?","With the list of texts that apply to your organisation and the evidence an auditor will request. A platform that does not cover your frameworks natively forces you to maintain a manual mapping, which recreates the problem you set out to solve.",{"q":341,"a":342},"Should automated posture scoring be a requirement?","It is useful for continuous monitoring, not sufficient for due diligence. An external score measures an exposed surface; it says nothing about the vendor's internal organisation, its sub-processors or its contractual commitments. The two approaches are complementary.",{"q":344,"a":345},"How much weight should hosting carry?","A lot, if you fall under the GDPR or European sectoral texts. Third-party risk data describes your critical dependencies; its location and the law applicable to it are selection criteria in the same way features are.",{"q":347,"a":348},"How do you estimate total cost of ownership?","By adding the subscription, initial configuration, residual internal collection time, integration cost and extra user seats. A cheaper platform that requires one more full-time equivalent costs more.",{"q":350,"a":351},"How long before the first campaign?","CISAPP's standard rollout targets 30 days: portfolio import, first assessment campaign, then activation of the compliance frameworks.",[353,354,355,356],"choose TPRM platform","third party risk platform criteria","TPRM comparison","TPRM RFP",{},true,null,"entreprise",[],[363,364],"tprm-saas","plateforme-grc-tiers",{"title":105,"description":102},"tprm-platform-selection-criteria",[368,373],{"label":369,"url":370,"publisher":371,"date":372},"ISO\u002FIEC 27001:2022 — Information security management systems","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.iso.org\u002Fstandard\u002F27001","ISO","2022-10-25",{"label":374,"url":375,"publisher":376,"date":377},"Regulation (EU) 2022\u002F2554 (DORA)","https:\u002F\u002Feur-lex.europa.eu\u002Feli\u002Freg\u002F2022\u002F2554\u002Foj","EUR-Lex","2022-12-14","en\u002Fcomparisons\u002Ftprm-platform-selection-criteria","A TPRM platform is chosen from the organisation's obligations, not from a feature list. Four questions rule out most candidates: which frameworks are covered natively, how evidence is tied to a control, where the data is hosted, and how much implementation effort is really needed before the first assessment campaign.","2026-08-16","L8Tl2b1mvyCH6eDAVpEOsQ2g7AjJAbS-OTpmI9l1dBM",1791391139627]