[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":206},["ShallowReactive",2],{"section-links-solutions-en":3,"section-links-reglementation-en":36,"section-links-guides-en":65,"section-links-comparatifs-en":90,"glossary-en-security-posture-score":103,"glossary-see-also-en-security-posture-score":196},[4,8,12,16,20,24,28,32],{"label":5,"to":6,"description":7},"DORA + ISO 27001","\u002Fen\u002Fsolutions\u002Fdora-iso27001-compliance-software","Run DORA and ISO 27001 in one platform: CTPP register, SoA, Annex A controls and unified audit exports.",{"label":9,"to":10,"description":11},"NIS2 vendors","\u002Fen\u002Fsolutions\u002Fnis2-vendor-compliance","Extend your NIS2 compliance to your vendor chain: assessment campaigns, supply chain mapping and regulator-ready exports.",{"label":13,"to":14,"description":15},"Supply chain","\u002Fen\u002Fsolutions\u002Fsupply-chain-cybersecurity","Map your supply chain, assess your vendors' cybersecurity and track remediation through to risk closure.",{"label":17,"to":18,"description":19},"Third-party GRC","\u002Fen\u002Fsolutions\u002Fthird-party-grc-platform","CISAPP brings governance, risk and compliance (GRC) together for your third-party ecosystem: regulatory frameworks, audits and risk register.",{"label":21,"to":22,"description":23},"TPRM SaaS","\u002Fen\u002Fsolutions\u002Ftprm-saas","CISAPP is a TPRM SaaS platform unifying assessment campaigns, scoring, dependency mapping and regulatory compliance.",{"label":25,"to":26,"description":27},"Vendor risk","\u002Fen\u002Fsolutions\u002Fvendor-risk-management","Map, assess and steer your vendor risk with campaigns, a security score and a centralised risk register.",{"label":29,"to":30,"description":31},"Questionnaires","\u002Fen\u002Fsolutions\u002Fvendor-security-questionnaire","Run preconfigured vendor security questionnaire campaigns (ISO 27001, NIS2, DORA, GDPR) and track responses in real time.",{"label":33,"to":34,"description":35},"SecOps score","\u002Fen\u002Fsolutions\u002Fvendor-security-score","Track a vendor security score computed automatically from external technical scans (DNS, TLS, exposure, headers, breach), with history and alerts.",[37,41,45,49,53,57,61],{"label":38,"to":39,"description":40},"AI Act","\u002Fen\u002Fregulations\u002Fai-act","Prepare your EU AI Act compliance: AI system register, FRIA and article-level mapping, connected to your risk management.",{"label":42,"to":43,"description":44},"DORA","\u002Fen\u002Fregulations\u002Fdora","Manage your critical third-party ICT provider (CTPP) register, TLPT testing, and ICT incidents in an audit-ready DORA framework.",{"label":46,"to":47,"description":48},"GDPR","\u002Fen\u002Fregulations\u002Fgdpr","Maintain your records of processing activities and DPIAs, and manage data breaches with a severity wizard and a 72-hour notification tracker.",{"label":50,"to":51,"description":52},"ISO 27001","\u002Fen\u002Fregulations\u002Fiso-27001","Manage your Statement of Applicability (SoA), Annex A controls and ISO 27001 audit evidence in a single platform.",{"label":54,"to":55,"description":56},"NIS2","\u002Fen\u002Fregulations\u002Fnis2","Manage your NIS2 obligations (Article 21 measures, significant incidents, supply chain) and prepare regulator-ready exports from one platform.",{"label":58,"to":59,"description":60},"Part-IS","\u002Fen\u002Fregulations\u002Fpart-is","EASA Part-IS compliance (Regulations (EU) 2023\u002F203 and 2022\u002F1645): aviation ISMS, PSOE levels, Present & Suitable self-assessment, evidence and audit questionnaire.",{"label":62,"to":63,"description":64},"TISAX","\u002Fen\u002Fregulations\u002Ftisax","Understand TISAX assessment levels (AL1 to AL3), the VDA ISA catalogue, label validity, and what an automotive supplier must prove to its customers.",[66,70,74,78,82,86],{"label":67,"to":68,"description":69},"Fourth-party risk","\u002Fen\u002Fresources\u002Ffourth-party-risk","Your vendors depend on subcontractors you've never assessed. How to identify and manage this often-invisible fourth-party risk.",{"label":71,"to":72,"description":73},"Questionnaire fatigue","\u002Fen\u002Fresources\u002Fsecurity-questionnaire-fatigue","Why security questionnaires overwhelm procurement, security teams, and vendors alike, and how to break the re-entry cycle without losing rigor.",{"label":75,"to":76,"description":77},"Supply chain attack","\u002Fen\u002Fresources\u002Fsupply-chain-cyberattack","How a cyberattack at a vendor spreads into your organization, why it's hard to anticipate, and how to structure your defense against it.",{"label":79,"to":80,"description":81},"Concentration & SPOF","\u002Fen\u002Fresources\u002Fvendor-concentration-risk-spof","How to identify single points of failure (SPOF) hidden in your vendor chain and map risk concentration before an incident reveals it for you.",{"label":83,"to":84,"description":85},"Due diligence","\u002Fen\u002Fresources\u002Fvendor-cyber-due-diligence","How to structure cyber due diligence before signing a vendor contract, what to ask, and how to avoid inheriting a third party's risk unknowingly.",{"label":87,"to":88,"description":89},"Incident playbook","\u002Fen\u002Fresources\u002Fvendor-security-incident-playbook","What to do in the first hours after a vendor discloses a security incident: a 5-step playbook to assess impact, contain, and document.",[91,95,99],{"label":92,"to":93,"description":94},"CISAPP vs spreadsheet","\u002Fen\u002Fcomparisons\u002Fcisapp-vs-spreadsheet-third-party-risk","How far a spreadsheet takes you in vendor risk management, and the point at which it costs more than a platform: a comparison on verifiable criteria.",{"label":96,"to":97,"description":98},"European alternatives","\u002Fen\u002Fcomparisons\u002Feuropean-alternatives-us-tprm-platforms","What choosing a European vendor changes for third-party risk management: applicable law, data transfers, sovereignty and GDPR compliance.",{"label":100,"to":101,"description":102},"TPRM selection criteria","\u002Fen\u002Fcomparisons\u002Ftprm-platform-selection-criteria","An evaluation grid for third-party risk platforms: regulatory coverage, assessment cycle, evidence, hosting, integrations and total cost of ownership.",{"id":104,"title":105,"author":106,"body":107,"definition":168,"description":169,"entities":170,"extension":172,"faq":173,"keywords":174,"meta":178,"navigation":179,"ogImage":180,"path":181,"persona":182,"publishedAt":180,"regulation":180,"relatedFeatures":183,"relatedPages":184,"seeAlso":185,"seo":189,"shortTitle":190,"slug":191,"sources":192,"stem":193,"term":171,"tldr":180,"updatedAt":194,"__hash__":195},"glossary_en\u002Fen\u002Fglossary\u002Fsecurity-posture-score.md","Vendor security posture score: definition | CISAPP","CISAPP",{"type":108,"value":109,"toc":162},"minimark",[110,115,125,129,132,155],[111,112,114],"h2",{"id":113},"a-score-is-for-triage-not-for-decisions","A score is for triage, not for decisions",[116,117,118,119,124],"p",{},"The score answers \"which vendors should I look at first?\", not \"should we sign?\". A well-rated third party that is the only provider of an essential activity is still a ",[120,121,123],"a",{"href":122},"\u002Fen\u002Fglossary\u002Fvendor-spof","SPOF","; a mid-rated one with no data access does not warrant an action plan. The meaningful reading always crosses score with criticality: the \"critical and poorly rated\" quadrant is what drives action.",[111,126,128],{"id":127},"conditions-for-validity","Conditions for validity",[116,130,131],{},"Three requirements keep a score usable:",[133,134,135,143,149],"ul",{},[136,137,138,142],"li",{},[139,140,141],"strong",{},"Traceability",": every point must map back to an identifiable answer or piece of evidence.",[136,144,145,148],{},[139,146,147],{},"Freshness",": an undated score ages silently — a certificate expiry should move it.",[136,150,151,154],{},[139,152,153],{},"Stable scale",": changing the weighting invalidates history and comparisons.",[116,156,157,158,161],{},"See ",[120,159,160],{"href":34},"vendor security score",".",{"title":163,"searchDepth":164,"depth":164,"links":165},"",2,[166,167],{"id":113,"depth":164,"text":114},{"id":127,"depth":164,"text":128},"A security posture score is a synthetic indicator aggregating a vendor's assessment results — questionnaire answers, certifications, evidence provided, known incidents — to allow comparison and prioritisation across third parties.","Definition of a vendor security posture score: what it aggregates, how to read it, and why it does not replace criticality analysis.",[171],"Security posture score","md",[],[160,175,176,177],"security rating","security posture","vendor scoring",{},true,null,"\u002Fen\u002Fglossary\u002Fsecurity-posture-score","both",[],[],[186,187,188],"security-questionnaire","vendor-due-diligence","concentration-risk",{"title":105,"description":169},"Posture score","security-posture-score",[],"en\u002Fglossary\u002Fsecurity-posture-score","2026-08-16","9bccmh1UnYv6QdrEySL3b22bMFPOneAeUVVggQGeudQ",[197,200,203],{"label":198,"to":199},"Concentration risk","\u002Fen\u002Fglossary\u002Fconcentration-risk",{"label":201,"to":202},"Security questionnaire","\u002Fen\u002Fglossary\u002Fsecurity-questionnaire",{"label":204,"to":205},"Vendor due diligence","\u002Fen\u002Fglossary\u002Fvendor-due-diligence",1791391151106]