Comparisons
Comparisons: choosing a third-party risk management tool
Spreadsheet, US TPRM platform, European solution: factual comparisons on verifiable criteria — functional coverage, hosting, total cost of ownership, compliance.
These comparisons rely on verifiable criteria: functional scope covered, data location, applicable legal framework, implementation effort, total cost of ownership. They make no unverifiable claim about third-party products — where a point depends on a specific commercial offer, we state the question to ask the vendor rather than answering on their behalf.
CISAPP vs spreadsheet
How far a spreadsheet takes you in vendor risk management, and the point at which it costs more than a platform: a comparison on verifiable criteria.
Read moreEuropean alternatives
What choosing a European vendor changes for third-party risk management: applicable law, data transfers, sovereignty and GDPR compliance.
Read moreTPRM selection criteria
An evaluation grid for third-party risk platforms: regulatory coverage, assessment cycle, evidence, hosting, integrations and total cost of ownership.
Read more
FAQ
They are published by CISAPP and argue a position: a third-party risk programme needs a single system of record, and a European provider simplifies GDPR compliance. The criteria and facts used are verifiable, and each page states what to ask a vendor so you can form your own view.
Ready to take control of your third-party risk?
I'm a company
We'll get back to you within 24 hours